4 Comments
User's avatar
Etticus Gumperton's avatar

“If they really want diversity, they should let in more low-income students, which will give them plenty of Latino and Black students anyway” --> Hits the nail on the head. Colleges are businesses mainly concerned with profit. Most schools actually want fewer low-income students, because they don’t pay full tuition. Hence, colleges value “demonstrated interest:” a proxy for wealth. Do you have the money to travel from far away from home? Can you hire a college counselor to help you write a compelling essay on your personal struggles? Colleges’ concern for the disenfranchised runs about as deep as their optics.

“And once they added in that only 1.5% of their faculty identified as conservative” --> indeed, there is almost certainly a strong effort to AVOID ideological diversity in elite colleges.

Expand full comment
Stuart's avatar

I wonder why lowering the voting age to 16 is so unpopular.

I believe in 'no taxation without representation' so I'm for lowering the voting age to whatever the legal age someone can work for an employer and pay state/federal taxes.

Expand full comment
Marc Novicoff's avatar

I think people just think of 16 year olds as too stupid to vote

Expand full comment
Charlie's avatar

It might make the elites squirm, but Marc is right on this one yet again. Bravo

Expand full comment